He said that it was not the Government's role to get involved in a dispute between two private companies following a meeting with Moynihan.

"I met Colin Moynihan at his request to discuss the current dispute between the BOA and LOCOG," said Robertson.

"The Government is not and cannot be a mediator in a dispute between two private companies and I reiterated that there was no additional Government money available to help solve the dispute."

The dispute centres on the distribution of any surplus money after the Olympics. 

The BOA is entitled to 20 per cent of any surplus and want their cut to be paid before the Paralympics costs are taken into account.

"I have encouraged the BOA to resolve the matter as quickly as possible in order to allow everyone to get back to making preparations to ensure 2012 is a great success," said Robertson.

The lack of support for the BOA decision to take legal action against London 2012 over the surplus from next year's Olympics from Robertson, who he considered to be a close political friend, is another big blow for Moynihan.

He is increasingly isloating those that were formerly his closest allies, including London 2012 chairman Sebastian Coe, International Olympic Committee (IOC) President Jacques Rogge and Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt.

Following a meeting of the National Olympic Committees, a group made up of all the Olympic sports, at the BOA's Charlotte Street headquarters vice-chairman David Hemery compared the dispute to a marriage breakdown.

"I find it very sad that the focus has moved to almost a marriage dispute going on," said the 1968 Olympic 400 metres hurdles champion.

"I would have liked to see greater harmony expressed between the Olympic authorities and ourselves.

"We have for many years had a great relationship with LOCOG and Colin [Moynihan] and Seb [Coe, London 2012 chairman] have been friends for many years.

"To have this kind of public dispute, I do not think is good in general.

"For me it is about the distribution of the surplus.

"If we are going to host the 30th Olympiad surely the whole of Britain should get some benefit from that endeavour.

"There needs to be some common sense spoken."

Moynihan claimed that "progress has been made" in the last 24 hours, adding: "I do not think the row is in the interests of sport and I hope that it will be decided."

He vowed that the row would not hurt his friendship with Coe, whom he praised as a strong leader for London 2012.

"The idea it would have an impact on our relationship is something that I would not countenance," he said.

Earlier, Coe claimed the situation had been correctly ruled upon by the IOC.

"We maintain focus on what we were actually put on this planet to do, which is to deliver the Games," he said.

"This dispute is narrow and technical.

"The right organisation to resolve that dispute has resolved it.

"The IOC has made a judgment, that judgment is full and binding.

"This really does not impact on the delivery of Team GB or Paralympics GB.

"The Government has funding in place for the athletes.

"It does not impact on the staging of the Games and that is what we do. The Government have made it very clear they are not mediating in this and there is no public money."

Contact the writer of this story at [email protected]


Related stories
March 2011: Government to try to broker solution to London 2012 cash row
March 2011: Moynihan isolated after own party turns against him over London 2012 row
March 2011: Top BOA officials suspended from London 2012 Board over cash row
March 2011: Exclusive - BOA cash problems force them to give up ANOC General Assembly
March 2011: IOC back London 2012 in funding row with BOA